Guns The Root Of All Violence - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1808 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/03/20 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Gun Violence Essay Did you like this example? Gun violence has aroused disputable controversies, both about the causes and solutions surrounding firearms. As time has progressed, the occurrence of mass shootings have become a dominant topic in the media, resulting in the question: should we outlaw guns? The second amendment, created in 1789, vocalizes mans right to bear arms. However, the escalating deaths originating from firearms displays the irreversible impacts these weapons have. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Guns: The Root Of All Violence?" essay for you Create order Prominent examples include the Sandy Hook, Pulse Nightclub, Marjory Stoneman Douglas, and the Texas Church Shootings, all occurring within a ten year time period. The definition of a mass shooting described by the FBI is an incident where four or more people are wounded or killed, the United States holding one third of these events. The Brady Bill, implemented in 1993 became a large stepping stone for gun control, leading to 976,000 denials of licenses in 2003. While some people argue that mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and societal illness like toxic masculinity contribute to the detrimental effects of gun violence, others argue that mental illnesses do not contribute to the effects of gun violence; possible solutions to correct this issue would be extensive background checks and the ban of bumper stocks. Mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and problematic stigmas surrounding the definition of masculinity, consisting of the glorification of violence and hostile behavior, contribute to gun violence. People with mental illnesses are a hazard to the public, as 60% of perpetrators of mass shootings in the United States since 1970 displayed symptoms including acute paranoia, delusions, and depression before committing their crimes (Ruddell). The 60% of those who possessed a mental illness had access to firearms, allowing the tragic deaths of children, mothers, and innocent bystanders to occur. Patients with spontaneous and aggressive impulses should not have access to hazardous weapons, since one consequence could be communities that are haunted with gruesome memories of the casualties. Those with mental illnesses should be restricted from accessing firearms due to their unawareness of wrong and right, potentially leading to permanent misfortunes. Specific mental illnesses in conjunctio n with fatal weapons jeopardize the safety of communities and lead to destruction, all of which are easily preventable with meticulous background checks. Additionally, toxic masculinity has contributed to gun violence. Many boys from a young age are bombarded with the constant exposure of gore and violence, induced by brutal video games, inappropriate toys, and war. Many are expected to push aside their natural instinct of fear and face grave conditions with a brave face. If they falter, they would be perceived as fragile and unworthy of the title as a man. Myritten states, men with weapons have the power, men are often expected by tradition to be either warriors and/or protectors, and failure to live up to these expectations leads to violence. Society assumes that dominance is tethered to the perfect image of a man, as boys from a young age have been embedded with the expectation to obtain leadership positions. If the expectations of a man are not fulfilled, these consisting of bei ng emotionless, courageous, and the breadwinners of the household, they are considered less of a one. The perpetual cycle that men encounter because of societys suffocating guidelines of what actions men are allowed to perform, contribute to mens desensitization of violence. The cycle that was forged on boys by society at a tender age causes men to become bound to their accustomed habits of normalizing war and violence. Mental illnesses such a schizophrenia and destructive social stigmas are one of the causes for gun violence. The notion that mental illnesses are the cause of gun violence largely categorizes a vast number of people as unstable, ruthless characters. The media is one of the culprits, as they frame those with mental illnesses to be belligerent patients. Siegel displays the influence social media has, as news stories describing acts of gun violence by persons with SMI (Severe mental illnesses) may exacerbate negative attitudes about an already stigmatized population. The phrase mental illness already holds a negative connotation and is a topic that is often submerged. Often, the media depicts those suffering from mental illnesses as corrupt citizens, resulting in the sway of public opinion to restrict firearms from patients instead of banning the weapons themselves. Large social media platforms do not specify each condition such a paranoia, schizophrenia, severe depression and anxiety. Instead, the media largely categorizes a vast, diverse population to depict a stereotypical hostile individua l. Additionally, civilians with the intent to harm others are difficult to detect as we lack tools capable of accurately identifying persons with SMI (severe mental illnesses) who are at heightened risk of committing future violence (McGinty). The media sheds an unflattering light on those with mental illnesses and presents them all as dangerous criminals; however, these mental illnesses are difficult to read and examine. Mental illness is a complex subject and has varying causes, the inaccuracy exhibited by social media to group them all in the same category displays ignorance. Although research has shown that those with mental illnesses have attributed to gun violence, detecting and predicting a pattern in patients is difficult. There is not a specific guideline or rubric to follow when one is attempting to predict a patients intent to proceed with a mass shooting. Therefore, mental illnesses do not contribute to gun violence and its attention should be refocused to banning guns a s a whole. Extensive background checks should be continued, eliminating the mentally ill from retrieving these firearms. Rigorous checks should be implemented instead of hasty glances at a candidates background. Research has shown a positive impact involving how background check rates are associated withsignificant decreases in the rate of gun accidents, and insignificant increases in firearm suicide (Friedman). The data shown enforces that background checks have decreased the rate of gun activity, concluding that the mentally ill should be restricted from retrieving weapons. Communities would transform into safer atmospheres, void of criminal activity and gruesome scenes of murders. The rate of activity would continue to drop if extensive checkups were placed along with routine monthly checks. If suspicious activity is found or reported, authoritative figures could delve into the situation and resolve the problem. As a result, the candidate would become cleared or have their gun privileges rev oked. Moreover, those with certain mental illnesses are reported to have erratic tendencies and are difficult to restrain. Lang emphasizes the importance of discussion involving mental illnesses as there was a link with aggressiveness and those possessing a mental illness, as those with schizophrenia, major depression, or bipolar disorder † were two to three times as likely as people without such an illness to be assaultive. The author does not generalize the entire population of those with mental illnesses, but specifies those that have the potential to be harmful. The rate of aggressiveness stemming from those with specific mental illnesses provides a statistical view as to how they could wreak havoc on communities. Disorders such as schizophrenia and depression retain sporadic impulses that can increase aggressiveness, leading to violence. The startling probability that those with mental illnesses are two to three times more likely to perform assaults should be alarming and cause a response for action. If in depth background checks were practiced, candidates that raised warning signals would promptly be denied. Extensive background checks would be a safety precaution to eliminate impulsive, unfit candidates. Countless lives could be saved if frequent background checks are installed. A bumper stock is an accessory that enables consumers to fire bullets faster, shortening the time it takes for a gun to recoil after a shot is fired. These attachments should be banned to decrease the number of potential bullets fired from those suffering from mental illnesses and those without. The accessory should not be permitted, as it transforms a regular firearm to a perilous automatic weapon used in war. Many influential figures have spoken, one being Bill Flores as he expressed theres no reason for a typical gun owner to own anything that converts a semi-automatic to something that behaves like an automatic (Elis). The representative of Texas, a republican state, has contradicted the routine view of guns. Bill Flores, a credible source and a representative of a pro firearm state displays the problematic impacts of firearms. The disasters that have been afflicted by bumper stocks outweighs what might be described as the benefits of these accessories. The conversion of firing a few to hundreds of bullets in minutes is a dramatic and alarming change. The action should be prohibited, as many citizens, including those with mental illnesses could abuse its ability. Hunters have excused the casualties caused by bumper stocks by describing the enjoyment of ruthlessly hunting animals using the accessory. Hunting meek innocent animals compared to the anarchy that guns have caused in the United States displays Americans absurd priorities. Bumper stocks have been the cause of tragedies in the United States have included the use of bumper stocks, one being the gunman who killed 59 people at a Las Vegas concert Sunday (Bolton). The Las Vegas mass shooting is the most detrimental event in United States history involving guns. The heightened impact of bumper stocks is displayed in this instance, as the accessory was abused for malicious intent. Stephen Paddock, the perpetrator, was documented using the a bumper stock that accelerates the recoiling of a gun. Easily, Pad dock fired hundreds of bullets into what was once a peaceful crowd. By banning bumper stocks, a dramatic decline in the death tolls involving gun activities would occur. This would result in safer environments for future generations to enjoy, without the lurking threats of mass shootings in unexpected settings. Firearms should be regulated due to its irreversible impacts on American citizens and U.S. history. These weapons of war have subjected our children, friends, and loved ones in a constant state of unexpected peril. Families fear to send their children to school, in hopes that they safely return without a bullet wound. A lack of gun education, background checks, and stricter firearm laws have made locations such as churches, schools, and the movie theaters targets for horrific massacres. Firearms are the culprit for the robbing of thousands of innocent lives every year and the need to banish these weapons become more and more apparent. The United States has confronted traumatic experiences due to firearms, as these weapons have imprinted images of bloodshed in citizens minds. If these weapons were abolished or regulated strictly, the United States could have the opportunity to reconcile and heal from the countless lives lost. News broadcasting another mournful mass shooting would beco me nonexistent to upcoming generations contrasting to how citizens today have been desensitized because of its frequency. If these weapons were banned or closely regulated, a state of harmony could be reached due to the silencing the sound of bullets, the cries of innocent victims, and the protests of the concerned.

The Traits of Heathclif in Wuthering Heights Essay

In Emily Brontà «s book, Wuthering Heights, we, the reader, are introduced to a group of interesting characters. The antiheroic main character, Heathcliff, is a complex character with many distinguishing traits. Heathcliff acts upon his feelings and creates quite a reputation for himself. Heathcliff is full of vengeance, nonetheless, he is very loving. Heathcliffs vengeance is shown and proven throughout the book. Even as a child Heathcliff would say things such as, Im trying to settle how I shall pay-back. I dont care how long I wait, if I can only do it, at last. I hope he will not die before I do?No, God won?t have the satisfaction that I shall?I only wish I knew the best way! Let me alone, and I?ll plan it out: while I?m†¦show more content†¦Hindley?s father favored Heathcliff, causing Hindley to dislike Heathcliff. Hindley treated Heathcliff as a nonentity and didn?t care about what happened to him. Heathcliff didn?t forget this, and when he got older he began to ga mble with Hindley. Hindley would gamble because after the birth of his son, Hareton, his if died and caused him to go mad. Heathcliff gambled with Hindley until his death, which got Hindley into debt. At this point, Heathcliff says to Hareton ?Now, my bonny lad, you are mine! And we?ll see if one tree won?t grow as crooked as another, with the same wind to twist it.? (Brontà « 175) This means that Heathcliff?s revenge on Hindley was on his son. Although this took a long time, Heathcliff kept his word and got the revenge he deserved. Although it seems like Heathcliff?s want for revenge takes over him often, Heathcliff is also a very loving individual. The love of his life, Catherine, expresses her love to Heathcliff, but then goes to marry someone else. Catherine leaves Heathcliff heartbroken, but his unconditional love doesn?t fail her. Right after Catherine?s death Heathcliff says ?Catherine Earnshaw, may you not rest, as long as I am living!?haunt me?Be with me always-- tak e any form-- drive me mad! only do not leave me in this abyss, where I cannot find you!?I cannot live without my life. I cannot live without my soul.? (Brontà « 156-157) This shows that even though Catherine tells

Similarities and differences between Syria and Lebanon free essay sample

In the world, there are thousands of beautiful countries. In Arab world each country it own beauty. Most of people in Arab world treading between Syria and Lebanon by which country better to visit, because they are a great and beautiful countries There are many similarities between them. Some of the similarities between the two countries are the weather, number of religions and currency while the three main differences are area and population, number of governorates and tourism. The similarities between Syria and Lebanon are weather, number of religions and currency. About the first similarity is the weather. For example In Syria the weather is extremely the same which is very cold with rain, cloud and ice and in the summer the weather is cool, it is the same thing in Lebanon. The second similarity is number of religions, both of Syria and Lebanon have three religions which are Islam, Christianity and Judaism but the most people in the two countries are Muslims. We will write a custom essay sample on Similarities and differences between Syria and Lebanon or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The last similarity between them is the currency which is Syrian and Lebanese pound and on they own language its Lira. The differences between Syria and Lebanon are area and population, number of governorates, political system and tourism. First difference is the area. The area of Syria is 186,475 km? and the population is 22. 4 million while the area of Lebanon is 10,400 km? and the population is 4. 425 million, which means that Syria is bigger than Lebanon but the population in Lebanon is higher than the population in Syria. The second difference is number of governorates. Syria have 14 governorates and it capital is Damascus but In Lebanon there are six governorates only and it capital is Beirut. The last different between Syria and Lebanon is the tourism. The last period of time Syria is passing through a big war so every tourist city inside it is destroyed and the all nature is damaged so Syria need a very long period of time to get back as well as it was but Lebanon have a lot of places to visit for instant restaurants, cafes and natural areas. In conclusion, Syria and Lebanon are two from the most beautiful countries in Arab world. Syria and Lebanon have the same, number of religions and currency and have different are area and population, number of governorates and tourism. I advice all of tourists to visit Lebanon and have fun with it restaurants, cafes and natural areas, and prey for Syria to get back as soon as it can.

Prison Violence UK

Question: Critically discuss the reasons given for violence in UK prisons. Answer: Prison Violence in UK Prisons Prisons do not possess a normal environment as all the criminals are kept there. So, it is not wise to confuse a prison environment with the normal environment. According to Bottoms, a prison is qualitatively greater than any other social institutions, it is actually a physical place which consists of a history and ethos of punishment. People with a history of violence are kept in prison for punishment and behavioral change. Prison is a place where people with a scarred history of violence attributes gathered in a place organized by staffs greatly outnumbered. The main aim of these staffs is to maintain discipline and peaceful environment. In recent years, the amount of violent incidents took place in UK prisons has increased gradually (Earle and Phillips, 2012). Violent acts include, suicides, self-harm incidents, attacks on prison staffs and sexual assaults are predominant. In the year of 2014, total number of 84 people committed suicide in comparison with 75 people in 2013. This i s the highest amount of suicide case in last seven years. A survey carried out by MoJ statistics show that there is an increase of 5 percent rise in self-harming cases. Fights in prisons increased nearly about 11 percent. Sexual assault cases were noted to be 170. These statistical data portraits the fact that prison violence is continuously in the UK. One of the theories behind the causes of this increase suggests that an increasing amount of prisoner in a single prison can cause psychological violent attributes among the prisoners. There is a total number of 84,865 prisoners in England only (Earle and Phillips, 2012). The Chief Inspector of Prisons, Nick Hardwick stated that the number increased population prisons are one of the major reasons behind the rising of suicide rates. The number of self harm incidents rose up to 24,748 incidents (Earle and Phillips, 2012). It is a concerning issue and the authorities should demonstrate some urgency to deal with this issue. The aim of thi s report is to highlight the major reasons which directly or indirectly influences prison violence incidents and design or suggest suitable interventions to overcome the issues. Some recent articles suggest that there are several reasons behind the rising rate of prison violence. Lahm concluded that, the theory of importation is applicable as both age and aggressiveness are Co related. These two aspects play a robust predictor of assault across all types of prison contexts. The theory of deprivation also plays a vital role as non-white prisoners engaged more in prison violence incidents. He also concluded that, rate of violence for aggressive prisoners are higher than other inmates. He also found that inmates under 25 participate in violent acts more than more aged prisoners (Earle and Phillips, 2012). Bottoms proposed that speculative and interactive model consisting good order and discipline in prisons comprising of a central role of legitimation. He supported to conceptualize the fairness of staffs, distributive fairness that is quality of discipline and complaints and fairness of the authority. He also agrees with the conceptual theory by referencing the Woolf inquiry and Ahmads study of inmates. The actual definition of prison violence is any which consists abuse, threat or assault of a person (Schenk and Fremouw, 2012). The explicit and implicit aspects of the prisoners safety, well-being and is also to be considered. The harm caused by violence can be physical, emotional or psychological. There are several cases of violence recorded in UK prisons. The murder of an Asian origin teenager named Zahid Mubarak is one of the most discussed cases. He was an inmate in the Feltham Young Offenders institution. The incident took place in the year of 2000 (Worrall and Morris, 2012). Another incident which can be highlighted is the attack on Peter Sutcliffe. The incident took place in F2. Also known as the hospital wing of the Parkhurst Prison. The attack took place on 10th of January, 1983.The attack was very severe and brutal. Peter suffered from such injury that he had thirty stitches. The attacker used a broken coffee jar as a tool. Another case which is famous is the murder of chi ld rapist Mitchell Harrison. The murder took place at the Durhams Frankland prison in the year of 2012. There are several other reports every year of similar sort of cases taking place in the UK prisons (Bennett, Crewe and Wahidin, 2013). Violence activities in the prisons can be categorized in several domains. Violence activities include verbal abuse, cell thefts, Exclusions, Robbery, threats, assaults, sexual assaults, bullying trading etc. Verbal abuses are considered as verbally cursing or using abusive language against someone. Cell thefts are stealing someone elses property (Crewe, Warr, Bennett and Smith, 2013). This kind of violence occurs between inmates only. Exclusion is forcing another prisoner to do something which he does not approve of. For example, one prisoner is forcing another prisoner to claim the privilege of T.V. Channels. Robbery is robbing prison property for own privilege. Threats are one of the most concerning prison violence lately. Threats are mainly given due to debts for money or drugs. Assaults are the most predominant violence in prisons in the UK. Though the rate of prison assaults is lower in number by comparison with the USA. Bullying is also regular incidents in the prisons. Sexual assaults are also increasing in the prisons. Trading includes sharing and lending in order to acquire profit. Lending often leads to extortion and robbery (Mulcahy, Merrington and Bell, 2013). Through the data mentioned above, it can be stated that violence in UK prisons is becoming a major concerning issue. To overcome this situation, one has to identify the causes of violent acts. Through the broad line researches, some causes are identified (Ginn, 2012). The effect of prison violence is found to be highly proactive in the regions of the United Kingdom. Various researches have been conducted within the country which focuses towards the exploration of prison violence and the ways to minimize its consequences. Moreover, exploring the staff violence against the prisoners is considered equally viable for these researchers. According to the latest information regarding Prison Violence, it can be analyzed that this issue is not only prevalent within the premises of United Kingdom, but also prevailed in other countries. Thus, an international concern regarding the situation was highlighted by most of the researchers, which stated to be one of the most serious affairs in the contemporary world (Wulf-Ludden, 2013). The environment and social nature of prisons are identified as the major reason behind the rising rate of violence in the prison. If the environment is not social and friendly, then the inmates become more aggressive towards co-inmates (Walsh, Davies, Bagshaw and Payne, 2012). Research evidence shows that the number of prison violence acts depends on the vulnerability of victimization. It is also suggested that violence in prisons is directly related to some factors such as young age, race or community, homosexuality, transexuality, severness of the offense, etc. racial discrimination and institutional also plays a vital role in the case of prison violence in the UK. There is also a theory that that victimization of prisoner by some co-prisoners are actually an opposite act as they were also victims of prison violence (Mason, 2012). Another aspect of the causes of rising prison violence is confining a large number of prisoners in a single prison. When a large number of persons are kept in a small place, it is natural that they will engage in violent acts (Earle and Phillips, 2012). One of the basic issues highlighted by the researchers focus towards the over crowdedness of the prisons. It had been observed that the prison population was doubled since 1994. Counting on the figure, it can be analyzed that the total population of the prisoners was estimated to be around 48,631. Doubling of the prison population had a huge effect on the level of prison violence within the premises. Focusing on the Howard League for Penal Reforms, one can easily identify the rate of prison over crowdedness within the United Kingdom (Earle and Phillips, 2012). In Kennet (HMPS) the Certified Normal Accommodation was estimated to be around 175. However, it was estimated that the population, which was sustained within the premises of Kennet, was 317. Thus, there was a total surplus of 142 more prisoners accommodated within the space of 175 (which accounted to 181% surplus content). Focusing to the second prison name; Leeds (HMPS), it can be accounted that the prison has an accommodation for 669 prisoners (Badger, Vaughan, Woodward, and Williams, 2014). However, due to the growing number of prisoners in the United Kingdom, this increased to 1,166. Thus, there was an excess of 497 (accounting to be 174% surplus content) within the premises. Highlighting towards the third case associated to Wandsworth (HMPS), it can be estimated that the prison has an accommodation for 943 prisoners. But, the survey result tinted towards the evidence of 1,577 existing prisoners within the premises. In the Swansea (HMPS) prison, the total accommodation of 271 get s overshot by 163%, as there is an evidence for 442 prisoners residing within the prison. Finally, the case of Exeter (HMPS) highlights towards the CNA of 318 prisoners. However, like the other case studies, it can be estimated that this prison also has the evidence for enrolling 511 prisoners within their premises and thereby overshooting the net prison population by 161% (Baillot, Cowan and Munro, 2012). Another cause, which can be pointed out, is the prison authority. Behavior of prison authority can raise a significant amount of frustration, powerlessness, deprivation. Feeling like this can provoke a rebellion mind state, which will result in prison violence (Badger, Vaughan, Woodward, and Williams, 2014). Theoretical models suggest that management practices should be maintained critically in order to control prison violence. Through studies, it is proven that prison management in UK prisons are not up to the mark. In a study carried out by McCorkel, suggests that correctional staffs of juvenile institutions promote and induce juveniles to use force on other co-inmates (Cole, 2012). Several studies suggest that, architectural designs such as prison cell structure also affect the prisoners psychologically. In the United Kingdom, many of the prison cells are common, that is, in one cell, a numerous amount of prisoners reside. It is proven that, keeping more prisoners in a single cell increases the rate of violence. If the prisoners are kept separately, then there is a decrease in prison violence (Sudbury, 2014). In 2012, it was estimated that nearly 12,000 prisoners faced the issue of over-crowdedness. It was estimated that the accommodation was nearly half of the total number of prisoners residing within the various prisons of the United Kingdom (Sudbury, 2014). Reflecting towards the consequences of overcrowding, it can be analyzed that there was a record of 15,000 acts of violence associated with a single year. Thus, from the figures provided by the Howard League for Penal Reforms, it can be easily analyzed that there is an effective interconnection between overcrowding of the prisoners along with the increase in the rate of violence associated to a prison (Badger, Vaughan, Woodward, and Williams, 2014). Ethically, it can be stated that every move of a prisoner should be efficiently and effectively monitored through CCTV footages. Complete surveillance based on this protocol is highly recommendable, as it is one of the most accepted protocols accepted in the worldwide. Apart from the CCTV footages, the Office-In-Charge of the prisons need to monitor the prisoners and keep a track of their daily moves. However, 15,000 reports of violence have been estimated which occurs mainly due to the surveillance protocol of the officers associated with the prison (Gilligan and Pratt, 2013). One of the most effective consequences associated to prison violence is Child Death (Langbein, 2012). Due to improper environment and ineffective administration system associated with the prisons of the United Kingdom, it was estimated that nearly 34 children died in the custody since 1990. Focusing more towards the evidences, it can be analyzed that two children died within a single month (January, 2012), which resulting in severe catastrophe within the country. Issues regarding safety and lifestyle were at stake. However, it was observed that there was never been a large scale public inquiry regarding the prevention of these death consequences (Mears, 2012). Based on these evidences, one can reflect towards a case study of Adam Rickwood. He was considered as the youngest prisoner to die within the prison (Scott and Gosling, 2015). He hanged himself after being restrained by four adult care providers situated in Hassockfield Secure Training Centre. He was retained within this prison for a month on the charge of wounding. The care givers implied nose distraction as the restraint, which was similar to a karate like a chopper. He was wounded on his nose and thereby bled for 1 hour. After six hours, he committed suicide within the premises of the cell (Shaffer et al. 2015). Apart from the consequence of Adam Rickwood, there are other brutal references associated with this context. Based on the recent survey reports, it can be analyzed that 20% of the investigations associated with self-inflicted deaths occurred due to the mistreatments from the other prisoners. Responding towards such violence was concerned as the prime factor of the investigation department of the country. In 2008, the Secretary of State committed the National Offender Management Services (NOMS) for the policy of Zero Tolerance, which was against the violence practices within the custody. The Prison Service Order (PSO) 2750: Violence Reduction highlighted towards the public sector prisons to involve local violence reduction strategy. This would be helpful in minimizing the torture level to some extent within the custody. From mid-2007, this policy was also enforced to the contracted estates, to maximize its effects throughout the country (Scott and Gosling, 2015). The PPO local strategies target towards minimizing the violence by several means. The commonly followed sectors involved; conflict resolutions, presenting dynamic securities, problem solving approaches, effective risk management, addressing towards the organization and environmental factors, behavioral management for the individuals and the offender management processes. The provision for the prisoners to consult their viewpoint regarding the reduction of violence is implemented within the prisons of the United Kingdom (Langbein, 2012). There is also an aspect where staff experience plays an important role in rising of prison violences in the United Kingdom Liebling and Arnold, 2012). Inexperience staffs are victims of violence by prisoners. According to Kratcoski, trainee prison officers faced numerous amount of prison violence in the past several years. In a study carried out by Munroe suggests that, the inexperience prison officer has a tendency to engage themselves in numerous prison violence cases as they are often perceived but the aggressiveness of prisoners. One of the major reasons behind this phenomenon can be pointed out as the jail staffs are not provided with an adequate amount of training. Due to lack of training, they have no experience and presence of mind to handle situations which are found in prisons (Coyle, 2013). Another aspect which can be highlighted is amount corruption level. It is very much clear no government administration is completely corruption free. Due to corruption, jail staff tends to be biased or favorable towards one particular prisoner or a group of prisoner. As a result a level of discrimination is created among the jail staffs. These kind of acts actually disrupts the normal balance among a particular jail prisoners. The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) introduced in 2004 by the Ministry of Justice states plays a vital role in setting strategic policies to keep control over the custodial services and the prison capacity. Primarily all the public sector prisons in the UK are by the agency (Trammell, 2012). The agency is solely responsible for managing the overall custodial service to promote proper support and assistance to the prisoners (Mullins, 2013). It is in the same year that the NOMS formulated an agreement termed as zero tolerance about violence reduction in prisons (Edgar and ODonell, 2014). The zero tolerance policy is a primary component of criminology and is commonly used as a formal and informal policing around the world (Mullins, 2013). The zero tolerance policy primarily imposes a decision regarding the automatic punishment regarding eliminating intolerable conducts. In other words, zero tolerance policies forbid the persons in authority from exercising any discretion or changing punishments to fit the situation respectively (Bierie, 2013). The authorities have only the power to apply the predetermined sentences regardless of the situation or individual. The authorities are also advised not to implement any severe punishment regarding the zero tolerance policy (Bierie, 2013). By the fact of responding to violence in prisons, apart from the zero-tolerance agreement, a set of rules, regulations and guidelines have also been established which are primarily outlined by the Prison Service Orders (PSOs) and Prison Service Instructions (PSIs) (Berman and Dar, 2013). The PSOs was issued on 31st July 2009. The central vision of the PSOs is to provide a set of terms and conditions that need stop be implemented to reduce the violence within the prisons. Thus, the PSO's helped in introducing certain laws and amendments that provided strict restrictions on the severe punishments that are primarily imposed on the prisoners. Thus, the prime target was to eliminate or reduce the violence inside the jail, which are faced on a large extent by the prisoners. The prison Service Order is guided by a set of PSO Prison numbers, which represents various kinds of rules and regulations. From the several sets of PSO numbers, PSO 2750 represents violence reduction for the prisoners (Berman and Dar, 2013). The law is primarily supplemented by a series of administrative regulations and guidelines. The orders also provided the management instructions and are primarily issued by the headquarters to offer a detailing about the prisoner documents, which includes the letters and visits, prison discipline (Liebling and Arnold, 2012). The orders seem to serve as a strategy, which tends to operate in an appropriate framework supported by a set of precise rules and guidelines. The 2011 PPO report suggested certain recommendations for the staffs, which include Recording and sharing of information regarding the bullying incidents Updating the regular entries Focusing on providing safety to a particular prison regarding information Use of other relevant methods to identify any bullying activity associated with any activity of the jail. Thus, the implementation of the effective strategies, which mainly includes the zero tolerance agreement and the PSO violent reduction act helped in providing the necessary guidelines to resolve the problem associated with violence in prisons. These strategies can be applied in prisons across the United Kingdom to overcome the current situation and reduce the amount of violent acts in prisons (Liebling and Arnold, 2012). The main aspect of this study is to highlight the current scenario of prisons situated in the United Kingdom. As, we all know, every proposal should be backed with proper references and statistical data. From the statistical data provided, it can be concluded that the current scenario is worse. For the past decade, the situation is gradually decreasing, resulting in an increase of violent acts such as suicides, self-harm incidents, attacks on prison staffs and sexual assaults. It can be also highlighted that the corruption is also affecting the situation, making it worse. For the last ten years, The Government of United Kingdom has implemented many steps and strategies to overcome this situation (Badger, Vaughan, Woodward, and Williams, 2014). But according to current statistical data, thos strategies are doing no good. Overcorwedness in prisons is highlighted as the most predominant factor giving rise to prison violences. The amount of prisoner in the United Kingdom jails is greater than the total amount of spectators can fit in the Wembley stadium. To make things better, the United Kingdom Government should take steps to reduce the population density of jails. Building new coreectional centres is the only way through which the aim can be achieved. The Government of United Kingdom should act straightaway in order to manage the current scenario. Juvenile prisoners are committing suicide, which is not a good sign for the government administrators and the society as well (Badger, Vaughan, Woodward, and Williams, 2014). Monitoring each and every prisoner, profiling each prisoner according to the committed crime can be implemented to make the situation better. It is clear that, only the government can make the situation better. Thinking prisoners as a normal human being and providing them care and comfort which also affect their current behavior. Prisoners who often engage in violent acts should be provided with CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) in order for the b etterment of their mental condition (Badger, Vaughan, Woodward, and Williams, 2014). It is clear that, violent acts are increasing day by day, which is also affecting the social-structure of the United Kingdom. As, a result proper steps should be implemented for the betterment of all parties involved (Badger, Vaughan, Woodward, and Williams, 2014). References: Badger, D., Vaughan, P., Woodward, M. and Williams, P., 2014. Planning to meet the needs of offenders with mental disorders in the United Kingdom.Psychiatric Services. Baillot, H., Cowan, S. and Munro, V.E., 2012. Hearing the Right Gaps Enabling and Responding to Disclosures of Sexual Violence within the UK Asylum Process.Social Legal Studies,21(3), pp.269-296. Bennett, J., Crewe, B. and Wahidin, A. eds., 2013.Understanding prison staff. Willan. Berman, G. and Dar, A., 2013. Prison population statistics.London: House of Commons Library. Bierie, D.M., 2013. Procedural justice and prison violence: Examining complaints among federal inmates (20002007).Psychology, Public Policy, and Law,19(1), p.15. Cole, S., 2012.At the Violet Hour: Modernism and Violence in England and Ireland. Oxford University Press. Coyle, A., 2013. Change management in prisons1.Understanding Prison Staff, p.231. Crewe, B., Warr, J., Bennett, P. and Smith, A., 2013. The emotional geography of prison life.Theoretical Criminology, p.1362480613497778. Earle, R. and Phillips, C., 2012. Digesting men? Ethnicity, gender and food: Perspectives from a prison ethnography.Theoretical Criminology,16(2), pp.141-156. Edgar, K. and O'Donnell, I., 2014. 4 Tracking the pathways to violence in prison.Researching Violence: Methodology and Measurement, p.69. Gilligan, G. and Pratt, J. eds., 2013.Crime, Truth and Justice. Routledge. Ginn, S., 2012. Prison environment and health.BMJ,345. Langbein, J.H., 2012.Torture and the law of proof: Europe and England in the Ancien Rgime. University of Chicago Press. Liebling, A. and Arnold, H., 2012. Social relationships between prisoners in a maximum security prison: Violence, faith, and the declining nature of trust.Journal of Criminal Justice,40(5), pp.413-424. Mason, P. ed., 2012.Criminal visions. Routledge. Mears, D.P., 2012. The prison experience: Introduction to the special issue.Journal of Criminal Justice,40(5), pp.345-347. Mulcahy, E., Merrington, S. and Bell, P.J., 2013. The radicalisation of prison inmates: a review of the literature on recruitment, religion and prisoner vulnerability.Journal of human security,9(1), pp.4-14. Mullins, J., 2013. Safeguarding in prisons.Mental Health Practice,17(3). Schenk, A.M. and Fremouw, W.J., 2012. Individual characteristics related to prison violence: A critical review of the literature.Aggression and Violent Behavior,17(5), pp.430-442. Scott, D. and Gosling, H.J., 2015. Before prison, instead of prison, better than prison: therapeutic communities as an abolitionist real utopia.International Journal of Crime, Justice and Social Democracy,4(3). Shaffer, C., McCuish, E., Corrado, R.R., Behnken, M.P. and DeLisi, M., 2015. Psychopathy and violent misconduct in a sample of violent young offenders.Journal of Criminal Justice,43(4), pp.321-326. Sudbury, J., 2014.Global lockdown: Race, gender, and the prison-industrial complex. Routledge. Trammell, R., 2012.Enforcing the convict code: Violence and prison culture. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Walsh, J.L., Davies, J., Bagshaw, R. and Payne, E., 2012. Staff Beliefs About the Negotiation of Serious Prison Incidents.Criminal Justice and Behavior,39(1), pp.59-70. Worrall, J.L. and Morris, R.G., 2012. Prison gang integration and inmate violence.Journal of Criminal Justice,40(5), pp.425-432. Wulf-Ludden, T., 2013. Interpersonal relationships among inmates and prison violence.Journal of Crime and Justice,36(1), pp.116-136.